Skip to Table of Contents | |
---|---|
This is the talk page for the article "Jiggle Butt Gang".
|
Adding Synopsis to this
I know this is a team and not individual character, but since none of them have a name, there is no information on what they did in KotSS arc besides the mission they did. There is no information regarding how they were in the jail and helped Natsu and other people... Like I said, none of them have a name so they can't have any synopsis on each characters. Why not add a synopsis for them since they are always together so people can know what they have done throughout the arc. 49.176.33.104 12:48, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Personally, I too think that the group should get a synopsis on this page. What the AWC said is correct, we have no summary for them and what they have done and won't because they do not have their own pages. As far as I can see, we have three options, so, like I did on the Main Page talk, I'll list them and see what you guys think:
- We do nothing and leave them summary-less.
- We add a short summary of the group as a whole to this page.
- We make three new pages for each member. However these will simply have to be "JBG member 1" "JBG leader" etc. >__>
Anyone have a strong opinion on which one we should do? Personally I hate character pages with retarded names, so I'm more for just adding a group summary here, but I don't know... Post your ideas below...
☆°・*CarrotSays...*・°☆ 13:12, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
2 - Retarded names are retarded. >__>
WrathZero 13:18, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Support #2 - I have to go with Carrot's number two since I prefer them having a Sypnosis section as a team rather than as individuals. These three are always together and do the same thing together, so I believe that one Sypnosis section would suffice. 9:21PM, May 14, 2013
Support #2 - Like what Red says. Laven (Talk) 13:31,5/14/2013
Support #2 - Better than character names.. RifatmfaridTalk 14:36, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Support - #2 or #3 I like number three better, because it gives us the chance to provide more information to the reader, but number two is also good. So I'll go with whichever.
Mega ♦ Talk 20:28, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Support - 3. Even if they don't have names, they are individual characters with their own lines and own personalities. I think unique character pages could work--GodPray20:31,5/14/2013
Support - 2 and 3. I prefer 2 more just because they were all a cohesive unit and I don't think an article of just 1 Jiggle Butt Gang member would be of much value to anyone content wise. However, 3 would make sense logically and it gives some work for the ASG.
:Umnei: 21:03, May 14, 2013 (UTC)