FANDOM


(Galuna Island arc)
(Lullaby arc)
Line 52: Line 52:
 
#{{Oppose}} idk, I like the anime pic.. plus was better fitting for the '''Lullaby arc''' than having Lullaby on it {{User:Ncduru/Sig2}} 19:13, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
 
#{{Oppose}} idk, I like the anime pic.. plus was better fitting for the '''Lullaby arc''' than having Lullaby on it {{User:Ncduru/Sig2}} 19:13, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
 
#{{Oppose}} I would have gone with neutral because as I know the current is not that good, I don't want the proposal :P But if I did so there might be a change of the proposal getting through so no.
 
#{{Oppose}} I would have gone with neutral because as I know the current is not that good, I don't want the proposal :P But if I did so there might be a change of the proposal getting through so no.
  +
#{{Oppose}} Nooooooooo! Please, no!! <span style="padding-left:6px; background-color:#CD6090; border:3px dotted #4F4F4F;{{border-radius|1em}}">[[User:MiraMajin|<span style= "font-size:15px; font-family: Georgia; color:#4F4F4F;">MiraMajin</span>]][[File:Mirajane_Chibi_2.PNG|0x52px]][[User_talk:MiraMajin|<span style= "font-size:10px; font-family: Georgia; color:#4F4F4F;">Talk! </span>]]</span> 14:39, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
   
 
{{User:Hamody Asgail/Sig1}} 19:25, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
 
{{User:Hamody Asgail/Sig1}} 19:25, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:39, September 12, 2016

PICTURE CHANGE ARCHIVES
    A         B         C         D         E         F         G         H         I    
    J         K         L         M         N         O         P         Q         R    
    S         T         U         V         W         X         Y         Z    

Profile Picture Changes

As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. All discussions must be left open for a minimum of two days before any change takes place. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete {{Fairuse}} and {{Fair use rationale}} templates attached to them or else they will be rejected. Anonymous users are not allowed to vote here!

  • Neutral: When you are voting neutral, please provide an adequate reason as to why you are voting neutral. Otherwise, there is no point in casting your vote.

Galuna Island arc

Support
  1. Support Support - Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Support Support - Well I love the proposal so XD DispellingSiegrain ChibiMage13:17,9/10/2016
  3. Support Support - Derax PaganiDerax Signature Image 16:43, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Support Support - NoNickNeeded (talk) 16:44, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Support Support - Ncduru 19:13, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Support Support - Hmm.... I seem to remember saying specifically when we voted on this the first time that the current image wasn't a good choice because of how wide it was. *glares at Misk* Iam...    JakuhōRaikōben04:09,9/11/2016
  7. Support Support - /// c h o k o /// m e s s a g e /// s t a m p : 13:03, 9/12/2016 ///
Oppose
  1. Oppose Oppose - The first pic, despite quality issues, was perfect. Then you guys replaced it with this purple, wide monstrosity. And now you'll want to completely remove Ur from the equation?! I hate all of you! *throws a tantrum* >.< --Sane Lunatic (talk) 13:10, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral
  1. Neutral Neutral - Yes, the current is far too wide, despite it being a great pic :( However, not so keen about the proposal.

HamodyKeyes FT siteAsgail 19:25, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

  1. Support Support - Onfire.gif Wonder Talk 14:23,9/12/2016
Comments

Admittedly, the change to the current image wasn't the best decision we have made. While the image looks good in itself, it looks terrible on the page because of how wide it is. On the other hand, the proposal has good proportions and is more arc-poster-like. Plus, a throwback to Mashima's early art is never a bad thing, right? Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Lullaby arc

Support
  1. Support Support - Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Support Support - Derax PaganiDerax Signature Image 16:43, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Support Support - I almost opposed tbh because the proposal, while super nostalgic, doesn't really wow me. But, on the other hand, the current looks hella blurry because of the Magic in the air. Iam...    JakuhōRaikōben04:11,9/11/2016
  4. Support Support - /// c h o k o /// m e s s a g e /// s t a m p : 13:03, 9/12/2016 ///
  5. Support Support - Same as Rai. --Sane Lunatic (talk) 13:10, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Support Support - I mean... just yes. Onfire.gif Wonder Talk 14:21,9/12/2016
Oppose
  1. Oppose Oppose - idk, I like the anime pic.. plus was better fitting for the Lullaby arc than having Lullaby on it Ncduru 19:13, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Oppose Oppose - I would have gone with neutral because as I know the current is not that good, I don't want the proposal :P But if I did so there might be a change of the proposal getting through so no.
  3. Oppose Oppose - Nooooooooo! Please, no!! MiraMajinMirajane Chibi 2Talk! 14:39, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

HamodyKeyes FT siteAsgail 19:25, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral
  1. Neutral Neutral - Will have to go neutral here, unfortunately. I love the old animation (hate me), but he proposal's fine as well. So Iunno :'<
    DispellingSiegrain ChibiMage13:17,9/10/2016
  2. Neutral Neutral - I don't really like either. The current one has Bob and Goldmine on it and the prop misses Lucy and Happy... NoNickNeeded (talk) 16:46, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

The current image is a blurry anime image, not much of an arc poster material, imo. The prop is so much better suited. Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Also, I suggest y'all click on the current pic and see how absolutely terrible the character art is. Miskos3 Message 23:38, September 10, 2016 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.