Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
;Comments |
;Comments |
||
Admittedly, the change to the current image wasn't the best decision we have made. While the image looks good in itself, it looks ''terrible'' on the page because of how wide it is. On the other hand, the proposal has good proportions and is more arc-poster-like. Plus, a throwback to Mashima's early art is never a bad thing, right? {{User:Miskos3/Sig3}} 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC) |
Admittedly, the change to the current image wasn't the best decision we have made. While the image looks good in itself, it looks ''terrible'' on the page because of how wide it is. On the other hand, the proposal has good proportions and is more arc-poster-like. Plus, a throwback to Mashima's early art is never a bad thing, right? {{User:Miskos3/Sig3}} 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | lol I actually agree with sane, I rather have the first pic back. I can't remember my comments on this but the overall current pic is good but the framing and tint isn't. I rather we change it back to the original one honestly if possible lol {{User:Ncduru/Sig2}} 14:41, September 12, 2016 (UTC) |
||
===[[Lullaby arc]]=== |
===[[Lullaby arc]]=== |
Revision as of 14:41, 12 September 2016
PICTURE CHANGE ARCHIVES |
---|
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
Profile Picture Changes
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. All discussions must be left open for a minimum of two days before any change takes place. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete {{Fairuse}} and {{Fair use rationale}} templates attached to them or else they will be rejected. Anonymous users are not allowed to vote here!
- Neutral: When you are voting neutral, please provide an adequate reason as to why you are voting neutral. Otherwise, there is no point in casting your vote.
Galuna Island arc
- Support
- Support - Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Well I love the proposal so XD DispellingMage13:17,9/10/2016
- Support - 16:43, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - NoNickNeeded (talk) 16:44, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Ncduru 19:13, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Hmm.... I seem to remember saying specifically when we voted on this the first time that the current image wasn't a good choice because of how wide it was. *glares at Misk* 夢Iam... 黒 JakuhōRaikōben死04:09,9/11/2016
- Support - /// c h o k o ★ /// m e s s a g e ★ /// s t a m p : 13:03, 9/12/2016 ★ ///
- Oppose
- Oppose - The first pic, despite quality issues, was perfect. Then you guys replaced it with this purple, wide monstrosity. And now you'll want to completely remove Ur from the equation?! I hate all of you! *throws a tantrum* >.< --Sane Lunatic (talk) 13:10, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral
- Neutral - Yes, the current is far too wide, despite it being a great pic :( However, not so keen about the proposal.
HamodyAsgail 19:25, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Comments
Admittedly, the change to the current image wasn't the best decision we have made. While the image looks good in itself, it looks terrible on the page because of how wide it is. On the other hand, the proposal has good proportions and is more arc-poster-like. Plus, a throwback to Mashima's early art is never a bad thing, right? Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
lol I actually agree with sane, I rather have the first pic back. I can't remember my comments on this but the overall current pic is good but the framing and tint isn't. I rather we change it back to the original one honestly if possible lol Ncduru 14:41, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
Lullaby arc
- Support
- Support - Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - 16:43, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I almost opposed tbh because the proposal, while super nostalgic, doesn't really wow me. But, on the other hand, the current looks hella blurry because of the Magic in the air. 夢Iam... 黒 JakuhōRaikōben死04:11,9/11/2016
- Support - /// c h o k o ★ /// m e s s a g e ★ /// s t a m p : 13:03, 9/12/2016 ★ ///
- Support - Same as Rai. --Sane Lunatic (talk) 13:10, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I mean... just yes. Wonder Talk ★★14:21,9/12/2016
- Oppose
- Oppose - idk, I like the anime pic.. plus was better fitting for the Lullaby arc than having Lullaby on it Ncduru 19:13, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I would have gone with neutral because as I know the current is not that good, I don't want the proposal :P But if I did so there might be a change of the proposal getting through so no.
- Oppose - Nooooooooo! Please, no!! MiraMajinTalk! 14:39, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
HamodyAsgail 19:25, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral
- Neutral - Will have to go neutral here, unfortunately. I love the old animation (hate me), but he proposal's fine as well. So Iunno :'<
DispellingMage13:17,9/10/2016 - Neutral - I don't really like either. The current one has Bob and Goldmine on it and the prop misses Lucy and Happy... NoNickNeeded (talk) 16:46, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Comments
The current image is a blurry anime image, not much of an arc poster material, imo. The prop is so much better suited. Miskos3 Message 13:12, September 10, 2016 (UTC)
Also, I suggest y'all click on the current pic and see how absolutely terrible the character art is. Miskos3 Message 23:38, September 10, 2016 (UTC)