Fairy Tail Wiki talk:Image Gallery

Profile Picture Changes
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete and  templates attached to them or else they will be rejected. Anonymous users are not allowed to vote here!

Post Timeskip
Proposal #1. The current is still kind of dark, and she's awkwardly holding her hand up while speaking, though her mouth is closed in the pic. Her expressions in the proposals are more her usual style.-- 05:56, September 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) 1 Her hand in the current one looks so...big. 05:59, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal #1. It's well lit,not showing her hand and it shows her usual expression. and her cleavage 06:08, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

I like Proposal 1 but it's really bright...
 * Changed my mine. After a little thinking, the current is perfectly fine how it is. Maybe a little weird but not everything can be perfect.

Sorry, I don't like any of them. The light and the background are weird in the proposed ones. Also, the current one is perfectly looking into the camera. 06:39, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * It isn't a perfect angle because in the current she's looking slightly down and to the right.-- 07:33, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * She's looking more away from the camera in both proposals, to be fair.

Both proposals are too bright. 09:26,9/29/2012

Because of the background I prefer the current. 11:50, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

No. Current is fine 22:36, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Obviously it isn't, because her arm is randomly thrown up there. We don't need random gestures in profile images, distracting from the subject matter. Also, the background is very dark and her expression is more bland than the others.-- 23:07, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Suzaku, her pose in the current timeskip image is very similar to that in her pre-timeskip and it looks fine. While the background in the first may be a little dark, both proposals are very bright. Also, the angles that she's in are more centered on her looking towards the bottom left of the camera rather than straight at it.

The current one (at least the original version) was made by me The proposals are way too bright... 04:54,9/30/2012

The current has a more crisp focus of her body and face whereas the proposals have a more blurred effect. 06:09, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

The current one is better than the other proposals. 10:05, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

I don't see what's wrong with the current one o__O 12:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Pre Timeskip
Proposal 2. The current is awkward because she's in the middle of making a gesture, so her hand is awkwardly in front of her face and she's also in the midst of turning her head, so her facial expression is strange. Just because her body is doing so many things that aren't the norm, I think the use of the current is inadvisable. Proposal 2 is the end result of her movements in the current image anyway.-- 01:13, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

I strongly dislike both proposals. In the first, her body is drawn weird and her expression is a bit unusual. I can see that there was an attempt to keep the arm pose but that particular screenshot doesn't work for me. The second proposal is better but her body movement is very awkward. The current gives her a more composed look whereas this proposal just makes her look as though she's stretching; kind of a lazy, lounging body expression.
 * Whereas the current makes it look like she has arthritis? >_> -- 01:36, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't really see that, but nonetheless, I think the current is fine.

Both. 02:32, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

In Prop 1 she's winking, and Prop 2 is similar to the current but doesn't show her boobs... so nah. 04:55,9/30/2012

Again, what's wrong with the current?? 12:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

I believe the current one is fine. 12:30, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

13:15, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Pre Timeskip
4 or 5. The current has an awkward expression that he doesn't usually use and his head is tilting to one side.-- 01:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal 5 is the most appealing.


 * 1) 5. 02:31, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal 4.

Proposal 3 is fierce. 04:29,9/30/2012


 * 1) 5. Brighter. 04:56,9/30/2012

5, I like it the best and I always thought the current was a little weird anyways. 12:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Prop 5. 12:30, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

5 13:15, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Post Timeskip
Even though the proposal isn't front-facing completely, I think Proposal 1 is better than the current which is zoomed in on his face, with his eyes looking upwards, also with his arms stretched out above his head. His facial expression is atypical of his usual demeanor, being, I think, a tad severer than his usual, somewhat casual self.-- 01:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

I actually like the proposal considerably but the angle is... weird. I think there's a couple of shots with a similar expression but better angle so I'll wait and see if more options are available. If not, then my vote will just remain the same.

Midnight looks better in that angle. 04:29,9/30/2012

This guy looks gay in every damn picture we take... 04:57,9/30/2012

Hmm, both are a little awkward, so I don't really care either way. Sure there isn't a nicer one anywhere?? 12:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, I've seen one or two in the latest episode. Gimme a second to get it :) 12:30, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * There, it's up. To be honest, I'm not sure about either of them so I'll vote later, I suppose. 12:41, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Prop 2. Awwww, thank you Misk *hugs* it's great. I'm sorry, but I hatehatehate the current and prop 2 just does it for me. I also stuck it in and previewed it and I like what I saw :) *pinches Miskos' cheek* So talented * ^ * 12:47, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal 2. Good job, Miskos. 12:49, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal 2. Nice job, now that can be a better profile picture. 12:53, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

His eyes are too close together, he's slightly hunched over and he has dimples. Awkwardness factor is very high.-- 13:13, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Racer

 * 1) 2 23:02, September 28, 2012 (UTC)

No... It's centering on his face in the current, which I think is much better. The proposal only has his face in the corner and the rest with his back.

Proposal 1 has cropped hands and feet which makes it look awkward while his back is shown more in a gauche position. Proposal 2 seems that his body is a bit dislocated. 23:51,9/28/2012

I support Proposal #3 because in the current image and proposals 1 and 2, you can't see his eyes. Also, the current, as I said when it was proposed some weeks ago, is kind of blurry (because it's zoomed in pretty close) and just not the best expression in my opinion; very bland.-- 00:10, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

I prefer prop 3 where we can see also his eyes. 11:50, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

Nether of the proposed would look good a s profile images. 22:37, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * The current doesn't work either, because he doesn't have any eyes.-- 23:07, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

Current seems the best one for now. 04:59,9/30/2012

The current has, at least, something of a center. The proposals are far too off for my liking. 06:07, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

The current one is better. 10:19, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Meh, the guy looks retarded now no matter what we do, so I don't really think changing will do much. That said, the current is horrible imo. 12:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Lol I agree with Carrot. Not much we can do, tho. 12:30, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Zero
Proposal 2. Either of the proposals are fine since they're front-facing angles, where as in the current he's looking off to the side somewhere. Between 1 and 2 though, 2 is more menacing and therefore I think more demonstrative of his personality. The current should be put in his appearance section or something like that.-- 01:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal 1. The second proposal is too zoomed in on his face and there's also a lot of shadows.
 * I think the shadows add character, since usually that gives off a more intimidating vibe.-- 01:35, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * He looks... morbid, with those shadows.
 * His name is Zero and he loves destruction! XD -- 02:07, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * His name is Zero and he loves destruction! XD -- 02:07, September 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) 2. It's the creepiest >:D 05:00,9/30/2012

Proposal 1. It looks more suitable given the infobox it will go in. 06:03, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed with pb 06:51, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Proposal 1 is better. 10:00, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Prop 1, the nicer of the two :) 12:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Prop 1. Why do we even have the current one up? o_O 12:30, September 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) 2 - It suits his evil personality. 12:56, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Edit button
Would it be butter if you put the tag so we won't see the Edit button. Because it doesn't look good well at least I don't what do you think!

16:23, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

Mega thinks so 2.16:43,1/25/2012

✅ 20:15, January 25, 2012 (UTC)