User blog comment:Woest/Chapter 382: Alegria/@comment-2214433-20140428113753/@comment-4829046-20140428164926

Sadly it seems this is a conflict of interest that is beyond just this topic. Our opinions on humanity is the differing factor here. Humanity wouldn't have gone extinct just cause some couldn't survive a considerably bad environmental change.

And doesn't really matter? Again, conflict of interest. My argument depends solely on the prospect that humans didn't go for the "civilized" route.

You seen to have mistaken it. I want a society or rather I want society to go back to the time where nudity was okay, but the problem that prevents that is the rape or rather sexual desire factor. In order to bring that about, you first need to go back and prevent humans from building ideas related to sex that turned sex into a negative light(It was originally just meant as method of reproduction and/or being social after all and wasn't just driven by pleasure) Once you do that, then no one will find a problem with it and it wouldn't be a "taboo" or "secret" or "mystery". It was a gradual thing. Humans didn't just suddenly decide, "Oh, we are gonna cover our privates and make sure others don't see them" like it states in the bible, no, it was something that slowly developed over centuries.