User blog comment:Leek0421/Fairy Tail vs One Piece/@comment-3987368-20150813170330/@comment-26350059-20150813182219

No because this is the first blog about FT vs OP. This is not the first time I've written about FT vs OP on this site but if you want credit then i'll give it to you. I started it because I read your reply. As far as what i felt you implied then my statement of "Basically said that FT had nothing on OP" stands if i felt that was what you meant. My statement was a summary of entire reply. I never said you said those exact words. also you never said that you didn't feel that way other then saying you never said that. That's why I said "basically". If your statements are about development then FT holds it's because we have seen FT story develop. The only thing we knew about Natsu was that Igneel raised him at the begining of FT. Now we know that he's Zerefs brother, he's END, he fought Igneel, and at one time he was Tartaros guild master. That reads like development to me.

If you ask me would Luffy do something in 777 as 77 maybe or maybe not because depending on the story but you can say the same with Natsu. If they were in Alvarez in chapter 5 and Zeref was there then Natsu would have most definitely charged in, now he retreated.

Long back stories I personally don't like them espeicaly if it takes you away from the main story line for some time. I like the Fishman Island story arc with Nami but the Skypia story arc took so long with its back story that by the time it got back to the main story I had to go back to pick up where it left off.

Now if you like OP, its overarching story, and character backstory more then FT I can't argue with that because that's your preference, but when you say OP has those things or that FT doesn't then yes I disagree because I BELIEVE that FT does have those and in some cases better then OP.