User blog comment:Miskos3/Fairy Tail Chapters 532 & 533, Review/@comment-7070784-20170422053208/@comment-7418318-20170427061136

"Oh so now you want to go to a different topic? Make up your mind."

How so? I've been talking about this topic from the very moment I joined this thread. But if you are refering to why I don't comment further on your theory, that's because unlikely as it is, at least it's theoretically possible (although it'd be terrible writing style if it was true and Lucy had those mental capacities just for this one scene and then never again). My grief in this case isn't you believing the theory, but you saying this theory is actual fact, when there are clearly other (and in my opinion far more likely) ways this could have gone.

It's funny how you did all that "research" and never bothered to tell about it until after I prompted for it.


 * Me: Go look it up in a dictionary.
 * You: I did!
 * Me: Must be a strange dictionary.
 * You: I looked it up in several!
 * Me: Why didn't you use the internet?
 * You: I did!

If you really had looked it up in multiple dictionaries (which is quite... odd to say the least... why bother with looking it up multiple times if the first time supposedly proofed you right?) and the internet, why didn't you provide any proof? Hell if you really had been right a single link would have prevented this entire discussion from going past 2 posts.

A link like this one http://www.dictionary.com/browse/literally.

According to this (which took me all of 5 seconds to find, it's also the very first one that Google spits out if you look for "literlly definition") you are wrong. The only case in which literally is used for anything other than the most obvious and basic meaning is in rare cases where it's used for exxageration, which wasn't the case in your sentence, and even that use is highly criticized by experts as the article points out.

I'm eagerly awaiting your attempts to shoot down this solid piece of proof that you are wrong.

"Why would I lie when I am telling the truth? That doesn't make any sense even for you." This sentence makes no sense. If I am thinking you are lying, I'm obviously convinced that you are not telling the truth and thus me calling you a lyer makes perfect sense from my perspective. And it also makes sense for you to lie from all I know about you. In several years of reading posts from you I have not once seen you admit to being wrong, but seen lots and lots of times where you tried to argue down a whole group of people disagreeing with you and even tried to argue about proofen facts.

From this I can only conclude that you are unable to admit to being wrong, so it would make perfect sense for such a person to lie to uphold the illusion of them being right.

Granted I only know you throuh your wiki posts so my knowledge regarding you is limited, but it's the only data I can base any judgement off of. And that information, coupled with my own knowledge of the word literally and my own look into a dictionary (along with everyone else who joined the discussion apparently agreeing with me), strongly suggest that this "truth" you claim can not exist and thus the logical consequence would be that you are either lying or hallucinating. I judged the former to be more likely.

"Not their fault..." Missing the point as always...

"So stop focusing on the word and focus on the real topic at hand if you want to make sense be taken seriously." We've coasted through several topics in the course of this discussion, so which one do you consider to be "the real topic"? Considering we did indeed drift through several topics with the word "literally" being the only constant in all posts... I'd even argue it is the primary topic between us, or rather the medium through which I am critizicing your inability to admit to being wrong.